The History of Xenix

https://www.abortretry.fail/p/the-history-of-xenix

by BirAdam • 3 years ago

41 11 3 years ago

vzaliva2• 3 years ago

I've spent a considerable amount of time porting various Unix C software to Xenix 286. My main task has been to identify and correct the implicit assumptions that pointers and integers are 32-bit, as opposed to 16-bit, and to ensure that there are no integer overflows. Some software was well-written, utilizing portable types and macros, while other software was a mess.

nequo• 3 years ago

Was this part of a hobby project or did you do this for work?

vzaliva2• 3 years ago

It was for work. I worked for a small ISP and they tried to use 286 machines as terminals and mail servers. So I ported stuff like CNEWS, UUCP and bunch of related stuff. It was around 1994.

PopAlongKid• 3 years ago

the ability to change the switch operator from / to - like XENIX/UNIX, and the ability to change the path separator from \ to /

I first learned about this from an article in the March/April 1984 issue of the newsletter published by Carousel Microtools (a company that implemented Kernighan/Plauger Software Tools from the book of the same name).

"Fortunately there is a way to suppress this confusion altogether. PC-DOS and MS-DOS version 2.x share a feature that is little known and which IBM never mentions."

jmclnx• 3 years ago

I had Xenix 286 installed at work on a 286 with 4M memory. Was very nice, but very expensive. Too mad it was not much cheaper.

BirAdam• 3 years ago

For UNIX, I think it was about on par, but for an OS for X86 it was crazy. Had it been cheaper, I think history may have been quite different.

ja27• 3 years ago

"By the end of 1984, Tandy was the largest UNIX systems vendor of their day"

My high school had I think the TRS-80 Model 16B with I thought 8-12 terminals attached. It was primarily used for a COBOL class, replacing a Burroughs mini and punch cards.

stevekemp• 3 years ago

I never personally used Xenix, but I did use SCO openserver & unixware, back in the day working for a billing company.

We had a bank of modems wired up, and the system would maintain SSH tunnels to remote sites, then use UUCP to transfer nightly batch-reports to a centralized location for processing.

My memory is hazy, but I remember having a hard time getting the system running on new hardware, and kernel updates were always a scary thing to apply - no change there I guess.

Even at the time though Linux (Debian) was starting to replace these machines due to cost grounds.

zubairq• 3 years ago

An amazing history of Microsoft, MS Dos,Xenix, logica, and SCO! Thanks

ThinkBeat• 3 years ago

My first sysadmin job ( along with webmaster and HTML/CGI programmer introduced me to UNIX and Xenix in particular. I immediately started spelunking around the system with my root account. I soon discovered that something seemed odd with the use of system resources. Poking some more I discovered some “hidden” folders. Turns out someone hacked the ftp server and setup a warez and porn distribution. (Possibly it could have been the former sysadmin who had set it up). I notified higher ups, removed the content and removed the ftp server.

A few days later the server crashed hard. Opened it up. The hard disk was leaking fluid. Notified the higher ups. Found myself in a taxi hauling the server of considerable size and weight to a taxi. We went to a contracted Xenix support center. Tney said there was nothing they could do to recover files. Stuffed in a replacement drive, installed a fresh version of the OS. Said they would send the broken drive to a different company. Hauling it back, get it setup. Two days later, the ftp site was up and running again.

I repeated what I did the last time. Then I sat down to read and understand the system at a far deeper level than I had so far.

andrewf• 3 years ago

“Despite this reduction in scope for MS-DOS 2.0, it did carry many bits of XENIX. The system adopted I/O redirection via less-than and greater-than symbols, piping, a hierarchical directory tree, file handles […]”

The source code for MSDOS 2 is available and the file descriptor stuff appears to be in https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/blob/master/v2.0/source/... and XENIX2.ASM. It stands in contrast to the File Control Block API which MSDOS 1 (née 86-DOS) modeled after CP/M’s API.

The History of Xenix

Related Stories