Apple gives in, two year warranty for Europe

https://plus.google.com/118292867302583509179/posts/fSep9V4n7aP

by danmaz74 • 14 years ago

66 17 14 years ago

plus.google.com

truxs• 14 years ago

I think the title is quite misleading, apple did not "gives in" they just force to apply the laws

ralfd• 14 years ago

It doesn't change much, because two year warranty was the law in Europe anyway.

danmaz74• 14 years ago

The biggest issue here was that Apple was selling an insurance extension for the second year.

Anyway, you don't want to have to go to court if your iPhone fails for a defect after one year and 2 months...

Schlaefer• 14 years ago

I don't see what changed at all. It still says 1 year for Apple's products (which Apple gave before) and 2 years for products sold by Apple (which is the law of land as it was yesterday).

kmfrk• 14 years ago

It's part a matter of semantics and part Apple who are dodging the law:

Where I live, what the EU law provides is not called a "warranty"; we use another word. Here, warranties are optional and for the manufacturer; if you build sturdy products, you can have a life-time warranty programme, if you want to. The warranty applies to the manufacturer.

What the EU provides is - in English - a "warranty" with a fixed period of, say, two years that applies to the seller of the product, not the manufacturer.

As sellers, Apple have probably not wanted to comply with the two-year seller warranty, but the other part of the problem is that they have mislead consumers to believe that they were not covered by this protection for the full two years. And even if they are not the seller, the consumers purchasing Apple products would still be covered by the European warranty, albeit through the seller of the product, leaving little if any reason to get AppleCare.

Take [this link](http://www.apple.com/support/products/ipad.html) for the iPad:

    Every iPad comes with one year of hardware repair 
    coverage through its limited warranty and up to 90 days 
    of complimentary support. AppleCare+ for iPad extends 
    your coverage to two years from the original purchase 
    date of your iPad and adds up to two incidents of 
    accidental damage coverage, each subject to a $49 
    service fee.

This information is misleading according to EU consumer law. Apple has continually been sued in countries such as [Italy](http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-16339651) for misleading customers, and I imagine that they've seen that their prospects of winning an appeal case are slim.

In other words, what is new is probably that Apple have found out that they can no longer dodge European consumer laws without a litany of suits and bad PR, so now they're resorting to this statement.

hackermom2• 14 years ago

No, 1 year is the EU minimum of product warranty.

yeureka• 14 years ago

This is interesting. I previously though of buying through John Lewis because they offer a 2 year warranty on computing products. I wonder if this will harm them.

hackermom2• 14 years ago

This isn't an extension of the one-year warranty. It's a clarification of the consumer complaint period and an acknowledgement of it. While EU mandates a minimum of 2 years, in some countries, this time period can be longer, like in Sweden where it's 3 years. However, there is a big difference between warranty and a consumer complaint case: Apple's warranty covers things that break after the customer has received the product - essentially a guarantee that the customer will be able to enjoy 12 months of fault-free goods - while a consumer complaint case covers defects and flaws (including false or erroneous marketing) that were present in the product before the customer received it. Examples of this can be a manufacturer claiming that an LCD screen is a 24-bit truecolor display while it is in fact an 18-bit dithering display, or claiming a certain resolution for a digital camera higher than the camera's sensor can actually provide.

If something in the product that was working ok and as advertised for 1 year suddenly breaks, you're not covered by Apple's warranty, and you're not covered by the consumer protection laws of the EU. If you within the established consumer complaint time period find that something about the product isn't as it should or isn't as advertised, you have a legal right to a full refund providing that you can prove that the problem in question accompanied the product when you received it.

The bottom line: you still just have 1 year of warranty, but now Apple also lets you know that you have another type of consumer right that extends beyond the warranty period.

morsch• 14 years ago

At least here in Germany, in many ways, the two-years "consumer complaint time" works out as an implied warranty. When I'm not discussing the difference between Apple's manufacturer warranty (Garantie in German) and the legally required one (Gewährleistung), I'd simply translate it as warranty. If anything, the protection offered by the Gewährleistung extend beyond the ones offered my many manufacturer warranties.

If any piece of electronics dies within two years that's not expected the die from mere use (e.g. laptop batteries), I immediately return it to the shop I bought it from (not the manufacturer) and I can typically expect some sort of remedy; repair, replacement or a refund. I'm not sure how much of it directly derives from the EU regulations, I sort of expected it to be very similar in other EU countries but I might be wrong.

Incidentally, we also get fourteen days to return anything bought online for a full refund, no questions asked, including shipping costs for for stuff >40 EUR. Naturally it ends up being a zero-sum game, the shops have to recoup those costs some way.

xyzzyz2• 14 years ago

In Poland, if a disagreement between sale contract and reality is found before 6 months from sale have passed, it is assumed that it existed when sale contract was made. If product does not work, and the fault is not on customer's side, it is considered to be a disagreement between contract and reality, and the seller is required to fix or replace the product. This way, there's a 6 months implied warranty on almost everything.

Of course, 6 months is less then 1 year, but I can easily imagine it to be extended further.

Also, IANAL.

jujjine2• 14 years ago

I worked for a German retailer for a while and we had a lot of problems with customers not understanding the difference between the warranty the manufacturer gives and the "warranty" required by European law.

The first difference is who is liable. In the first case it is the manufacturer, in the second case the seller of the product.

The second distinction is to when it applies. In the first case Apple will repair anything that breaks during coverage, unless the damage is caused by carelessness. In the second case the "warranty" only applies to what is alredy broken when the seller gives you the device. Examples where this warranty does not hold, is when your hard drive breaks after 8 month or some connections ports stop working after 14 months although they once worked.

In summary the European warranty reduces to a protection for the customer, that the seller doesn't deliver a broken product. So in principle a manufacturer doesn't need to give any warranty at all, but the sellers would not be comfortable with that as in the first 6 months, they have to prove to the customer that the product was working at delivery, which is arguably impossible.

The only case where the European law results in additional coverage for the customer compared to the year apple gives, is when a defect was present at delivery and the customer only noticed it after one year and is able to prove that the defect was there at the beginning. I would like to see someone trying to prove that there was a manufacturing defect causing a connection port to disconnect from the motherboard after 14 month (or did you yank on that cord to much?...).

dchest• 14 years ago

This is either a badly written law or a very seller-friendly interpretation of it. Surely, if a hard drives breaks after 14 months of use, it is either the consumer's fault or a manufacturing defect.

The fact the liability is on seller shouldn't change the interpretation of "breakage". At least in the Russian consumer protection law, you can go to the seller instead of the manufacturer if your computer breaks, and it's up to the seller what it does with it -- if you don't get it repaired in 45 days, the seller must pay you the full price or send a replacement.

I would like to see someone trying to prove that there was a manufacturing defect causing a connection port to disconnect from the motherboard after 14 month

And that's why in some countries the burden of such proof is on the seller.

jujjine2• 14 years ago

Well I don't think the problem is about wether it's seller or customer friendly but how the cost is distributed between the customers. If the warranty is high, the additional support costs will added to the product price, such that the support penalty is effectively shared between the customers. On the other side, if the warranty period is short, the product price will be lower, but a small number of customers must pay a lot to repair their devices out of warranty. Then one needs to take into consideration that there are many ways to break a device by being "sloppy" but not fall outside warranty constrains. I try to be careful with the devices I own and in the first case I would have to pay for the carelessness of other people and I don't like that. On the other side high repair cost can be a large burden to single individuals, which is when it is reasonable to share risks in the community (see, e.g., medical costs).

This is why I guess the European law is basically about getting a working device in the first place and not about how repair costs are being distributed, which is non-obvious to decide.

xyzzyz2• 14 years ago

It's not 14 months, but in Poland, if it happens before 6 months, it is considered to be a defect that existed during sale.

tomflack• 14 years ago

In Australia we have an "expected life" provision in consumer law, where more expensive products have a higher expectation they'll keep working - a $2000 fridge should last longer than a $200 fridge for instance.

I've never seen it actually applied to Apple products, but a "reasonable person" as defined by the law would surely expect a $1,799.00AUD Macbook air to last longer than the 12 month warranty covers.

Does anyone know of such cases?

Apple gives in, two year warranty for Europe

Related Stories