Wikipedia bans editors but sidesteps broader action in Holocaust distortion row

https://www.timesofisrael.com/wikipedia-bans-editors-but-sidesteps-broader-action-in-holocaust-distortion-row/

by kurtreed • 3 years ago

7 4 3 years ago

timesofisrael.com

jruohonen2• 3 years ago

It's all over the place: cf. e.g.

https://kirjat.finlit.fi/EN/page/product/the-finnish-ss-volu...

not_your_vase• 3 years ago

Wikipedia is great for many things, but finding neutrality or even attempted objectivity about recent and contemporary events is not one of them. (Then again, it's the nature of the internet I guess). Of course some big events get some splash (like this), but 98% of these shenanigans go unnoticed unfortunately.

jruohonen2• 3 years ago

Mostly I find Wikipedia a great source for non-scientific information, and, most of all, a fun source to go through all kinds of weird and/or forgotten things. But cases like this are alarming as these are apparently backed by state actors and national laws.

kurtreed• 3 years ago

Wikipediocracy and Wikipediasucks.co has so many documentations on Wikipedia shenanigans and occasionally, scandals.

Wikipedia bans editors but sidesteps broader action in Holocaust distortion row

Related Stories