Gitbox 1.5: native undo for git operations

http://www.gitboxapp.com/

by oleganza • 15 years ago

107 19 15 years ago

mathrawka• 15 years ago

Looks nice and I'm sure there is a great market for this kind of app. I'd be interested in hearing reports of how things.

As for me though, I still prefer the command line :)

taylorbuley• 15 years ago

I generally think it can be dangerous to build a reliance on tools like these, especially when one doesn't yet understand the command line equivalents

That said, I paid for this app and have used it to manage merge conflicts that would have otherwise driven me nuts w/o a GUI

jwallaceparker• 15 years ago

> I generally think it can be dangerous to build a reliance on tools like these, especially when one doesn't yet understand the command line equivalents

Good point. I agree.

That's interesting that you use it exclusively for merge conflicts. I will give it a look.

jbrennan• 15 years ago

It's a lovely app and it's got a beautiful website, too!

basil• 15 years ago

Great UI, much cleaner than GitX. However it seems to be missing my favourite feature from GitX which is the ability to stage hunks.

frou_dh• 15 years ago

As well as being clean, it can also be nicely keyboard driven. On the whole, a great understated design!

jarin• 15 years ago

Hmm that is pretty cool, looks like it's a smart front-end for git rebase?

waleedka• 15 years ago

Looks like a solid app, and fast as well. It's clear that the developers care about quality. But I'm sticking with GitX because GitBox is still missing a few key features:

- It doesn't have a good representation of the branch tree (like GitX). It's a must for anyone who deals with multiple branches.

- I can't stage parts of a file. GitX makes that really easy.

- I can't see the contents of a stash (again, easy in GitX). But GitBox makes it easy to see my list of stashes, which GitX doesn't.

- GitX also wins in that I can see the changes made in a commit by simply clicking the file name. GitX opens a third party app.

- It's not clear to me why there is a big vertical space on the left dedicated to listing my repositories, while my branches are hidden behind a small drop-down box. I'm more likely to deal with multiple branches than multiple repositories at any one time so it makes more sense to keep my branches visible and hide my other repositories behind a drop-down menu.

On the other hand, I really like that GitBox refreshes it's state automatically. This is one of the issues with GitX that I need to hit Cmd-R every time I switch to it. Overall, great start.

shaggyfrog• 15 years ago

Visualizing diffs inside the app is also a must-have for me. Fewer clicks = simpler = easier to use = better.

I also note that the apparent keyboard shortcut for "Show Difference" is just "D". Not command-D. Just "D". Not only is this highly unusual (no keyboard modifier like Cmd/Ctrl/Shift/etc.) but it also doesn't work.

ksylvest• 15 years ago

Awesome.

dustingetz• 15 years ago

is zero-friction undo even a good idea? rewinding in git is something that should be done with care, I'm not sure I would be comfortable with non-experts making "undo commit" part of their everyday toolset.

davvid• 15 years ago

I've thought long and hard about undo for git operations. I always decided against it (in git-cola). all it takes is someone doing some git commands in a terminal to (dangerously) confuse the undo stack. That's not the target audience of this GUI, though. pretty neat.

skrebbel• 15 years ago

> is zero-friction undo even a good idea?

Yes. It's the major missing feature for git. Novices spend more time figuring out how to undo their mistakes than anything else.

If the undo has side effects (i.e. "if someone cloned this branch since you did the action you want to undo, stuff will break"), the tool should display that warning and ask to continue.

Undo on local working branches only would already be a big help.

avit• 15 years ago

About a month ago I tried all the commercial Mac Git clients (SourceTree, GitBox, Tower, Gitty) after being frustrated with my old copy of GitX. I just couldn't get into any of them. I was missing the tree views, so I can see where branches diverge, staging of hunks, and overall they were all too "weird" to use in their own way.

I ended up going back to GitX when I found there's a more recently updated fork maintained by German Laullon: http://gitx.laullon.com/ It has a few bugs, but I find it's much more usable than the commercial alternatives.

insanecanadian• 15 years ago

Pretty nice, though I am a little annoyed that the number of repositories in the demo went from three to one. Other than that, seems like a nice update!

rapind• 15 years ago

Looks pretty cool, but for the love of god please slow down your slideshow (maybe 6-8 seconds instead of 4).

ajanuary• 15 years ago

Or add the ability to pause / control which slide to view.

oleganza• 15 years ago

You can click the previews - the slideshow will stop.

Corrado• 15 years ago

I was coming in here to ask what Gitbox has over the Github no-cost alternative, but found out about GitX. When did GitX get a native GUI!?

I've used GitX in the past but mostly as a crutch when the terminal client confused me (or when I needed pretty pictures.); It's X11 foundation always turned me off on the Mac. However, the latest GitX looks really good and might even turn me from my terminal ways. :)

Gitbox 1.5: native undo for git operations

Related Stories