Home warriors

http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11819706&fsrc=RSS

by terpua • 18 years ago

14 8 18 years ago

economist.com

joshwa2• 18 years ago

$6-33k for "telepresence?" Skype video chat + cheap webcam accomplishes the same thing for $25.

xlnt• 18 years ago

Not the same.

"Depending on the number of screens used, these high-definition video teleconferencing systems that deliver life-size images of the participants used to cost $500,000 or more per room."

Life-size video chat!

joshwa2• 18 years ago

+ XGA LCD Projector ($800)

mhartl• 18 years ago

In this vein, you might find this Robert X. Cringely article interesting: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070831_0028...

Money quote:

Video conferencing has been around for a couple decades, but telepresence is different from that. You can see the entire other side of the conference table, for example, and the people who are sitting across from you appear to be life sized. They can see you and you can see them. When another person speaks to you they can look you in the eye. Body language and emotions are easy to detect and the sound of each participant seems to come from his or her direction. You can watch the people who aren’t talking to see if they are even paying attention. It really is tele-PRESENCE and the fact that you are looking in a video screen is forgotten after a minute or two.

danw• 18 years ago

They even make sure to decorate all the rooms used in the system identically with the same lighting so as not to ruin the effect

marvin• 18 years ago

I've stopped trusting "improvements" to office life. It is obvious that all these ideas help everybody do more faster, but as we all know, the increased productivity has not had any material effect on the wages of American office workers. This article attacks the wrong side of the issue; it's not about whether telecommuting will cause problems for the individual worker. If this is really a good idea, any problems will be sorted out in due time. The real debate should be about whether the individual employee has any interest in accepting things like these.

Telecommuting has great promise, but I'm almost at the point where I'd like to say 'fuck you' to any company incorporating such aids. Giving half my wage (and rising, thanks to this!) to an executive is not my idea of earning a living.

Where they are applicable, startups use all of these techniques anyway. And the workers actually get more than superficial benefits. There's nothing to prevent small companies from going the same route...

nazgulnarsil• 18 years ago

cities are vestigial for high technology jobs. the only thing they make sense for is manufacturing.

Home warriors

Related Stories