NY to SF by Train in Four Hours

https://mco.dev/ny-to-sf-by-train-in-four-hours/

by marcacohen • 6 years ago

3 6 6 years ago

eesmith3• 6 years ago

Via a hyperloop.

Points to Hardt Hyperloop, and extrapolates to a NY/SF trip. However, Hardt's own FAQ says:

"The hyperloop is a good alternative to short-distance flights and links up seamlessly with existing modes of transport."

To estimate what "short-distance" means, the Hardt site promotes Amsterdam-Paris. That's about 250 miles, http://www.gcmap.com/dist?P=AMS-CDG .

A NY/SF trip in 4 hours @ 600 mph = 2,400 miles. the great circle distance is 2,574 miles - http://www.gcmap.com/dist?P=SFO-NYC - so the author's times can only be reached with a non-stop, dedicated track between those two cities.

Which is an unrealistic waste of money as it would be a national tax that only really benefits NYC and SF, and not the nation.

The author writes:

Under FDR’s leadership, the federal government pulled the United States out of the Great Depression, in part, by funding ambitious public works projects, like building our vast interstate highway system.

The interstate highway system was Eisenhower not FDR. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt points out that FDR's expanded the "Reconstruction Finance Corporation, making it a major source of financing for railroads".

It looks like the article contains bad math, bad monetary policy, and bad history. I don't think that's a good way to promote hyperloops.

marcacohen2• 6 years ago

1. The article is meant to be aspirational, not literal. We're talking about 2040 and what we could accomplish, if we put our minds to it.

2. I did the same calculations you did but went with a more provocative headline for reason cited in 1. above.

3. Re: only benefiting NY & SF, if you read my article you would know that I'm advocating a network of trains to replace the antiquated, wasteful, and enviironmentally unfriendly extant network of highway systems.

4. FDR and roads, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_Progress_Administration.

In response to your final comment about bad math, etc, I would say that your feedback is replete with the kind of overrly-literal interpretation, detail knitpicking, and generally holier than thou attitude that has given HN a bad reputation. Nonetheless, thank you for sharing your thoughts.

eesmith3• 6 years ago

Then use 5 hours instead of 4.

You can't aspire using the impossible. You'll drive off those who are wary of scammers and grifters, leaving only the gullible.

The WPA didn't find the interstate highway system.

brudgers• 6 years ago

I recommend driving from New York to San Francisco as a research project. It will take you through Omaha, across Nebraska on the Overland Route (or Lincoln Highway or I80 or the Oregon Trail -- fortunately your sister is unlikely to die of dysentery these days) and along the Platte into the Wyoming Basin, then down into Ogden, across Nevada, over Donner Pass, and down into Sacramento before finally reaching the Bay Area.

The most direct route hasn't changed because the geography hasn't changed. You'll spend a thousand miles going up and down mountains and valleys. Most of it will be sparse desert and bitterly cold in the winters and broiling hot in the summer. Sparsely populated -- even Reno is only 1/2 a million people and everyone Casper, Wyoming will fit in a Division I AA football stadium because it's all a long way from anywhere of much importance except to the people who live there.

Though I said I recommended it as a research project, I really recommend it because driving it will probably change your life. It's beautiful and remote and awe-inspiring in a way that the average place that people live isn't and doesn't convey over a few hours in the air 8km up.

There are only four practical rail routes across the US. One further north through Montana and down to Portland used by the Great Northern. One south of the Oregon Trail that follows I40 over the Colorado Plateau south of the Grand Canyon. And finally, the only all-weather line across the width of Texas through El-Paso and southern New Mexico and Arizona. It's the reason for the Gadsden Purchase.

The highway system is what public transit looks like in the US because the US is what it is. Increasingly vast, rugged and remote once you cross the Mississippi. Vast, rugged and remote in a way the tends to make it map poorly between the way we tend to think about political geography relating to physical geography.

The reason there isn't high speed rail across the US isn't in the details. It isn't because of some great conspiracy. It's in the course grain of physical geography. It's not a lack of imagination. It's an abundance of rail expertise applied over the better part of two hundred years.

NY to SF by Train in Four Hours

Related Stories