Music Theory and White Supremacy [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr3quGh7pJA

by kbob • 6 years ago

4 7 6 years ago

rbecker3• 6 years ago

When did focusing on one's own culture become "white supremacy"? How often is this standard, this demand for cosmopolitanism, applied to other cultures?

eesmith3• 6 years ago

The comments are - surprisingly - on topic and cogent!

They suggest that you and I need to watch the video, where your question will be answered.

It appears to boil down to how "music theory" is described, vs. what it actually does.

One comment: "As an outsider to music theory, this is kinda mind blowing. I assumed that music theory was like linguistics but for music. A field of study that attempts to explain the structure of all types of music from around the world. Now music theory seems to be more like teaching Spanish and then saying you know everything about all the languages."

That is, what's called "music theory" should be called something like "Western Classical Music theory" (as one commentor says it done in South Africa).

Another writes: "As I commented on that 12tone video, this really reminds me of freshman seminar discussions of the literary canon, and efforts in the 60s-80s to open it up. It would seem that music in the academy is going through a lot of the uphevals that other humanities disciplines went through in the last century. "

rbecker3• 6 years ago

That is, what's called "music theory" should be called something like "Western Classical Music theory" (as one commentor says it done in South Africa).

In Italy, Italian restaurants are just called "restaurants".

So Music Theory doesn't differ much from how History or Geography or Literature are taught all over the world. I agree that when speaking to a global audience, some clarification would be nice, but that's a very low bar to call it "white supremacist".

The comparison with literary canon is apt. The one I was exposed to in school was composed in great part of works that are completely unknown to English-speaking audiences. Yet we didn't feel the need to call ourselves supremacist for focusing our studies on our own culture.

ksaj• 6 years ago

I have a music theory book from India that has English translations after every paragraph. It never once says "Indian Music Theory" even though so much of it doesn't connect well with "Western Music Theory." It just says "Music Theory." I suspect the same is true for Chinese, Japanese, etc. since their music theory would also be different than for the West. It just seems unlikely that any culture will refer to it as "something other than Western music theory," and will just call it "music theory" with an apparent audience in mind.

One thing I thought was interesting is that the book states unequivocally that classical guitars are not appropriate instruments for "professional music," and are even inferior because they are "out of tune" all the time and cannot be played in any particular key. Is this Indian Supremacy at work? It could come across that way, but really they are speaking to a specific group of musicians that simply aren't playing Western music.

Whenever the book refers to guitar in a positive way, it is always the steel string slide guitar played on the lap, since they are capable of hitting the "right" notes and accommodating the "correct" techniques.

Music Theory and White Supremacy [video]

Related Stories