Remind HN: webOS Announcement Today

http://www.palm.com/us/company/events/

by malte • 15 years ago

80 40 15 years ago

palm.com

xal• 15 years ago

Please oh please open source it. You failed to do it with Be, please learn from the past!

xuki2• 15 years ago

I don't think so. WebOS is a valuable asset and HP definitely want to keep it to themselves.

We'll see =).

aidenn02• 15 years ago

I don't think they care if they keep it to themselves or not so long as they have a fair amount of control over it. They've been bitten in the past being tied to a 3rd party for improvements to their mobile OS and want to avoid that. If WebOS hadn't gone up for sale, they would likely have used Android

oconnore2• 15 years ago

webOS is already very open. It's basically a linux kernel with a few binary drivers for the radios, and there really isn't a need to hack on those.

xuki2• 15 years ago

The most valuable things in WebOS are the GUI and UX design, not the kernel or drivers.

I'm interested to see what they came up with in tablet form.

ddkrone2• 15 years ago

People had been doing some pretty nifty stuff even before the native SDK for webOS came out so I'm not sure what you mean by open sourcing it. Among the various platforms they are probably the most open and their developer tools are light years ahead of anything the competition has to offer.

mikecane2• 15 years ago

The countdown clock is for the website refresh. The live event begins at 10AM PST.

ugh5• 15 years ago

That’s 6 pm in London, 19:00 in Paris and Berlin, right?

Times zones make my brain hurt.

binbasti• 15 years ago

Try http://everytimezone.com

fname• 15 years ago

Touchpad leak: http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/palm-touchpad-leaked-1-5-...

allwein• 15 years ago

Sadly, there's no news on the relevant question yet. Will it be price competitive with the iPad?

ugh5• 15 years ago

I think there are several unanswered relevant questions:

1. Is it priced competitively (base model between $400 and $600)?

2. Does the software fit the form factor (unlike current Android tablets)?

3. Is its hardware up to the task (not in terms of specs but in terms of “snappiness”) and does it have competitive battery life?

4. Will it be available immediately or very soon?

Some of those questions will be answered today, others only later in reviews.

protomyth• 15 years ago

which links to http://www.precentral.net/it-s-touchpad-exclusive

ddkrone2• 15 years ago

I really hope they do come out with something nice. I wrote applications for the palm pre with their ares IDE and it was a blast. They just don't have the user base to make it worthwhile for developers and it sucks because I don't think anything beats HTML/Javascript when it comes to writing mobile apps.

mhd• 15 years ago

Just hope that they'll keep supporting the original Pre. I kinda like the little pebble, hardware is fast enough and with some decent software upgrades it still should come in handy.

mdb2• 15 years ago

Anyone know of any live-blogs following the event? Is there a live video broadcast?

kmanlives• 15 years ago

precentral is live blogging at: http://www.precentral.net/hp-palm-thinkbeyond-liveblog

mdb2• 15 years ago

Engadget's also got a liveblog:

http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/live-from-hp-palms-think-...

mikecane2• 15 years ago

Veer, Pre 3, and HP TouchPad. So, those are the names. Still waiting to see what they are like.

oconnore2• 15 years ago

Weird, the Pre2 hasn't even hit a major carrier and they are going to Pre3. Also, awesome.

mgkimsal3• 15 years ago

I dearly hope the offer a decent tablet that is inexpensive and not tied to a mobile carrier. I think one of the things that killed Palm/Pre was that they tried to play the 'mobile phone' game, when they could have gone 'retro' with the "pda without a mobile phone" and done much better.

Lots of geeks and non geeks would be willing to give a device a spot in their lives that doesn't displace their current mobile phone. Given the current state in the US, we're overwhelmingly tied to 'contracts' and steep monthly fees. The threshold any device needs to meet to displace our current devices at any given time is huge.

However... many people are willing to plunk down $150+ for an iPod Touch - which is for most purposes an iPhone with no phone, which also means no contracts, carriers, monthly fees, etc. If you like it, great! If not, it'll make a nice gift for some family member or friend. The barrier to trying one out is much lower.

Regardless of the initial price ("free phone!") most of us now understand that any "mobile phone device" we get is going to cost us $500-$1000/year for multiple years. Playing that game is way too costly - the stakes are too high - the carriers have no real incentive to push you 3 months from now when the next model of something else is 'new'. iPhones have been the exception to all this, and betting your company on being the next disruptive exception was/is foolhardy (Palm pre-HP).

Apple already proved there's a large market for wifi-only devices - let's hope HPalm's new webOS devices offer sanely priced wifi-only options.

mdasen• 15 years ago

I think to be successful, Palm would have had to offer both a PDA and a smartphone. I think the problem was that Palm didn't have the resources to do both. Even when you look at something like the Palm Pre 2, you can kinda see that Palm hasn't been able to keep up. At a time when only the really low-end devices have 320x480 screens and 3.1" screens, the Palm Pre 2 gets introduced with those specs.

Apple has shown that there's a decent market for modern PDAs like their iPod touch. However, it's a bit harder to make something like an iPod touch due to the lack of subsidy. The iPod touch lags behind the iPhone because of that. The new iPod touch's display doesn't have IPS, it's rear camera is a paltry 1MP, etc. I'm guessing Apple's margins on it are probably lower too. Plus, I feel like I should point out that the iPod touch starts at $230, more than 50% over your $150 mark.

I think the smartphone space is a logical place to start. There's a reason why HTC, LG, Samsung, and Motorola have all created great Android smartphones and have left the PDA space to Apple. I'd love to see more devices without a monthly recurring charge. However, I think the smartphone space is a lot more profitable and I don't think that Palm had the ability back then to move against Apple's iPod touch. With HP backing them (and if HP is willing to risk it), they probably have the resources to try.

*Palm also hitched their wagon to Sprint which was, at the time, haemorrhaging customers. Verizon customers waited for the Droid line, T-Mobile customers already had Android devices, AT&T customers already had the iPhone, and Sprint customers probably knew that Palm wasn't going to create a second platform against Apple when Apple was on a more popular carrier and was, well, Apple. If Palm had been non-exclusive before the Droid, Droid Eris, and Hero came out, they might have done a lot better. But they thought they could do what Apple did and force users to a specific carrier - with the exception that Apple was forcing customers to the #1 or #2 carrier depending on the quarter while Palm was trying to force customers to the #4 carrier (based on net adds before their devices came out).

EDIT: Think about it this way: Apple is charging $200 for an iPhone with contract. They're charging $600 without a contract. There's a $400 difference there that AT&T is covering. Now, one could argue that Apple was trying to charge more for the no-contract phone, but really Google is selling the Nexus S no-contract for $530 so there's still a $330 difference. Anyway, a 3G radio isn't costing them $300-400 to add to the iPhone. The economics of high-end smartphones are more appealing than PDAs and that's a big reason why the Android manufacturers aren't paying much attention to it compared to what they're doing for phones.

mgkimsal3• 15 years ago

valid points - i meant to type $200, but for some reason was thinking of the nanos and other devices and got $150ish in my head.

The huge sales of the touch at $230+ make my point even more, though, in many ways. People are OK with spending a moderate amount of money on a decent device. We can't be expected to drop everything for the next 'mobile device' that requires 2 year contracts all the time. Yes, tech bloggers and a few ubergeeks can do this - most people can't and won't.

"There's a reason why HTC, LG, Samsung, and Motorola have all created great Android smartphones". I think it's because they're basically lazy and unimaginative. Having Android dropped in their lap means they can ride a bandwagon without having to spend as much on R&D - they can use that money for even more invasive "nascar/nfl" licensing deals to put non-removable widgets on the device homescreen! (yes, I'm more than a bit cynical about this).

I had had high hopes for Palm with the webOS was first launched, but saw them trying to play the 'me too' game by only offering mobile phones, which are tied to carriers, and bring a huge baggage with them - legions of people who will never leave or never use particular carriers.

It's all water under the bridge now, but if anyone had the ability to redefine the PDA space, it was Palm, if only because of the legacy of the name. Well, that tied with the relative boldness of webOS - I wanted one, but I didn't want to have to tie up thousands of dollars and years of my life with a particular company.

FWIW, I have done that with AT&T/iphone, but relatively late in the game, and opted for it only after I realized how poorly the pre was going to play out being tied to sprint. I occasionally travel overseas and couldn't deal with CDMA only, and also already had some family on AT&T and the 'free minutes' thing tipped the balance.

mgkimsal3• 15 years ago

re: contract phones.... they're still tied to carriers, no? I don't think I can use that no-contract iPhone on any other carrier than AT&T, can I? I really don't know. It's insulting to have to pay that 'subsidy' markup when in fact I can't use it on any other network anyway.

listic• 15 years ago

> iPod touch's display doesn't have IPS, it's rear camera is a paltry 1MP

Wow, I totally missed that, and I have a 4G iPod (my first Apple product). Apple must have evaded this fact really well; I assumed that those specs are the same as in iPhone. How did you know that?

mlinsey• 15 years ago

The day before Verizon iPhone day? Poor timing IMO.

jarin• 15 years ago

I just wanted to chime in and say that webOS is pretty cool to develop for. I went to a developer outreach event in San Diego a while back, and managed to make a fully-functional FMyLife app in less than 3 hours (not knowing anything about webOS beforehand).

Developing for webOS is a lot like developing Flex applications (which I had done previously), except the API is way less complicated than Flex's API, and it's all in HTML/CSS/JavaScript. I had a set of posters with all of the Flex objects/events/methods and it was seriously 3 posters worth of 9pt text.

I was really happy to hear that webOS was given new life at HP, because I had a really nice time developing for it and I was hoping that it would get some traction so I would have a reason to develop for it for real.

btipling• 15 years ago

The OS is promising but the phones are ugly. Those keyboards are just weird looking. I hope webOS takes off though, a trio of iOS, Android and webOS would be pretty cool.

wazoox• 15 years ago

The keyboard may be weird-looking, but more importantly it's pretty easy to use and way more efficient than on-screen keyboards.

prestia• 15 years ago

Is Verizon really launching two phones this month (Pre 2 and iPhone 4) that will be superseded by summer? That two-year contract is going to hurt.

ugh5• 15 years ago

Why?

Normal people don’t buy a new phone every year.

asolove• 15 years ago

Oh boy oh boy oh boy, nothing makes me quite as excited as "Planned availability this summer." What terrible marketing.

superdude• 15 years ago

"Vibrant 18 bit" display - is that just spec jargon for a cheap TN panel? 6-bits for each R, G, and B? The IPS panel in the iPad is a huge selling point for Apple. It is higher quality than almost any modern laptop screen.

Remind HN: webOS Announcement Today

Related Stories