R in production systems

http://erehweb.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/r-in-production-systems/

by papps • 15 years ago

39 16 15 years ago

erehweb.wordpress.com

thangalin• 15 years ago

The Climate Reports (http://www.whitemagicsoftware.com/software/climate) has been running for 10 months, without a single failure. The Climate Reports uses R to calculate the trend line.

During development, I encountered a bug with one of the packages. I told the author and he not only fixed the bug within 24 hours but also offered to create a custom build for my CPU architecture.

I have only good things to say about R and its community. And I think R is sufficiently stable for production.

chillaxn4• 15 years ago

I have been reconsidering my workflow for a more data-centric approach. When I first looked around the search results for data-centric workflow, I was shocked that it was limited mostly to theoretical discussions and commentaries.

Why don't we have communities online focussed around using tools and platforms that allow informed discussion and decision making to solve entrepreneurial problems??

secret• 15 years ago

The advice to go 64-bit and throw RAM at the problem brings back memories of my computational math class.

pjscott• 15 years ago

I believe this is one of the problems that Incanter was made for: really easy embedding in a larger software system. Of course, it's nowhere near as featureful or widely-used as R.

http://incanter.org/

wesm5• 15 years ago

R is a stable enough language to be used successfully in production systems. But I would definitely not recommend building anything "big" in R-- I've tried and the entire process was not pleasant. R is a research environment for statisticians or statistically-minded practitioners in other fields-- and there has not been terribly much effort (from what I can tell) to change its status. I'd be happy to hear from others who've had similar (or different, perhaps positive) experiences.

It's actually my experiences trying to build production statistical processes in R that have motivated me to work on building out the statistics-related libraries for scientific Python. Hopefully within a couple of years we'll have something that's competitive with R in terms of ease-of-use and comprehensive statistical functionality out-of-the-box.

chillaxn4• 15 years ago

Do you think that Python libraries or a comprehensive development push will overcome barriers to entry for statistical process platforms? What if the greater adoption of these techniques is more limited by communities of users than the developers?

wesm5• 15 years ago

Depends on what you're referring to by "statistical process platforms". Python has been quite popular in the machine learning communities for several years, with some pure Python libraries (e.g. nltk, scikits.learn), and many wrappers to non-Python libraries (Orange, Shogun, and I'm sure some others).

One issue at the moment is that there's an R package for just about anything you would want to do. But the issue with R is its software development tools (which are not very good) and its ability to integrate with other systems.

As far as mainstream frequentist statistics in Python, there's still a ways to go. scikits.statsmodels has made a lot of headway the last couple years in implementing standard linear (regression) modeling classes and econometrics tools, with some time series analysis and other things thrown in (I'm actually actively working on adding time series analysis functionality to that library).

My general view is that given how friendly a language Python is for scientific programmers and the vibrancy of the community (in terms of new tools being built, etc.), Python could become a permanent fixture for statistical computing. Add on top of that things like integrated distributed computing inside IPython and projects like PyCUDA (which could make high performance statistical computing much more accessible), it's looking very good. But there's a slight chicken-and-egg problem at the moment.

I should also point out that R is sort of a frankenstein of half-baked object oriented ideas and remnants of the Splus era. So if you want to design extensible classes for statistical models, it can be quite challenging.

hyperbovine2• 15 years ago

I have often wondered when something Python-ish will come along to compete with R. I like the power of R, and there is no better choice if you require an esoteric statistical estimator, but there are also a lot of downsides. It's difficult to debug, the interpreter seems flaky, and parts of the SPLUS syntax feels dated. Also, I know it claims to be object oriented, but I have never really understood the OO system in R. So much more time and effort is being poured into improving the Python runtime, that it seems silly not to try to build something on top of it.

I am starting a stats PhD in the fall and have about nine months to kill between now and then. I'm seriously considering devoting all that time to building something like this.

mattwalker62• 15 years ago

good article... I have just launched a site (http://www.promepi.com) which uses R to recommend news articles to users. My co-founder used a lot when getting his masters degree, but I was new to it. It has been great to quickly develop our algorithm.

Anyone have experience with Revolution Analytics? My cofounder looked at these guys as we try to scale the site... he definitely agrees with one of the comments that "big" datasets are good in R and hopefully our site gets to a big dataset, so we are looking at scaling options.

ShabbyDoo• 15 years ago

ESRI (The geospatial software company) and SAS (the commercial alternative to R) both got caught up reacting to their existing user bases instead of proactively watching the analytics world. Both companies have (or at least until recently had as my knowledge is circa-2008) very desktop-centric product lines. Their customers used their products as if they were fancy versions of Excel -- a perfectly valid use case, but not one suited to production analytics. Both companies first forays into production systems involved clunky wrappers around desktop components. I'm sure they will eventually put out first-rate headless production components, but there's probably a nice window available in which start-ups may innovate.

R in production systems

Related Stories