Business 2.0 Doesn't Do Backups, Lost Entire June Edition

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/01/news/magazine.php

by usablecontent • 19 years ago

10 6 19 years ago

Sam_Odio• 19 years ago

Also on techcrunch: http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/02/june-issue-of-business-20-deleted-before-going-to-print/

danielha• 19 years ago

I don't know much about publishing, but I would think each department has a copy of their respective contributions. If I liken their editorial system to version control, why wouldn't, say, the art department have layouts on their local machines?

lupin_sansei• 19 years ago

It isn't so bad, they did manage to recover the content:

"But all is well, he said, and the magazine will go to press on schedule next week. The recovery was made much easier, paradoxically, by a bane of modern business: litigation, or at least the fear of it. "The text had all been copy-edited and sent off to the lawyers, so it had been saved as e-mail," Quittner said."

mynameishere• 19 years ago

They had a backup server. Misplaced automation is the villain. Makes sense to automate a task that you do 100+ times a day, but backups are generally run once a day, and are recovered maybe once a year.

My backup system involves a script with a bunch of copy commands that I can see flying by in the console as they work.

nickb• 19 years ago

Classic case of 'Do as I say, not as I do' ;)

"How to protect company's data"

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2006/11/01/8392042/index.htm

hundreddollar• 19 years ago

Too bad they weren't using Mozy!

Business 2.0 Doesn't Do Backups, Lost Entire June Edition

Related Stories