How Exercise Boosts Your Brain

http://singularityhub.com/2010/08/05/exercise-boosts-your-brain-%e2%80%93-here%e2%80%99s-how/

by jamesbritt • 16 years ago

72 21 16 years ago

palish2• 16 years ago

We all know exercise is your best shot at having a healthy heart, a strong immune system, and maybe even a 100th birthday party.

Wasn't this just recently proved false (here on HN)? The sentence may as well read "We all know the sun orbits the Earth" or "We all know that you have to write real programs in C".

Or rather, if you spend most of your day sitting behind a computer, then it doesn't matter how much you exercise, you'll likely be dead by eighty. (Which is quite a liberating viewpoint if you simply accept it.)

dreaming• 16 years ago

In the context of the benefits of exercise, i'd imagine we need to be careful not to conflate health and longevity before we debate things being 'proved false'.

Also, obligatory [Citation required]

palish2• 16 years ago

Proved was the wrong choice. Implicated is probably more accurate.

But really, there was some article very recently that made all the same points.

stingraycharles• 16 years ago

I think you are talking about this NYT column:

"The Men Who Stare at Screens", http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/14/phys-ed-the-men-who...

HN discussion: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1514818

loewenskind• 16 years ago

Uh... no. There was the results of a survey that seemed to indicate otherwise, but a survey is, ya know, a bunch of data of what people answered to questions.

"Truth" doesn't work the way you seem to think it does.

moonhorse• 16 years ago

Another theory is that low calorie diet leads to longevity. Too many theories. :)

pjscott• 16 years ago

It's good that we have a lot of observed correlations between various activities (exercise, low-calorie diets, etc.) and longevity. That way we can figure out what's going on biologically, and try to find easier and more effective ways of living longer, healthier lives. Science!

DavidSJ• 16 years ago

So the next time you sit down to watch television, or, um, surf the internet, remember: your BMP count might be getting into dangerous territory.

Try to imagine that same sentence with "to read a book" substituted for "to watch television, or, um, surf the internet". Hard, isn't it?

This is anti-technology bigotry. Pretty surprising at singularityhub.com, huh? That's how pervasive it is.

theBobMcCormick2• 16 years ago

I would assume they picked the examples because it's singularityhub. Most of their readers are likely to be technology/gadget centric and a message about more tech centric activities was probably expected to resonate better than a message about something as "old fashioned" as reading a book.

Beside, be honest. What percentage of the population do you think actually spends more time reading books than watching TV and surfing the internet?

BTW: According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, watching TV accounted for more than half the total leisure time for Americans 15 years and older. (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.nr0.htm)

johngunderman• 16 years ago

I used to. I don't watch TV, but I probably spend too much time on the computer. Just a few years ago I would read more than any other activity.

r7000• 16 years ago

Maybe surfing the net is more addictive than reading a book.

tomjen3• 16 years ago

I must have seen a million of these "benefits of exercise" posts by now - everybody seems to think that exercise is a good thing, but making another post isn't going to change anything, people are still not going to exercise; making a drug that simulates the effects of exercise would change everything.

So why aren't people working on that?

orangecat• 16 years ago

So why aren't people working on that?

I would hope they are. Of course if something like that actually comes out there will be lots of pushback from those with overdeveloped Protestant work ethics. No pain no gain, it's "cheating" to just take a pill, etc.

theBobMcCormick2• 16 years ago

At least hear in the US, I've never seen the public apposed to taking the easy way out. Witness the massive(no pun intended) diet and weightloss industry.

galdosd• 16 years ago

Oh, but the situation is even worse than that-- the Protestant work ethic already caught you (or us, or many people, whatever).

I'm talking about the assumption that exercise is some sort of pain for gain tradeoff that you would suffer through in exchange for a later reward, but is itself unpleasant or undesirable without the health benefits. This insiduous paradigm seems to be everywhere in (at least) American culture.

And so the magic pill already exists! And there's no patent. No copay. No HMO can deny you it. And it's fun!

eru• 16 years ago

How about using electricity to make your muscles move without effort on your part? (Of course this won't do anything for your central nervous system or coordination.)

klipt• 16 years ago

They are, but it takes years to get from "tested on mice" to "safe for humans".

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/0403/03.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25949447/#slice-2

When it does happen though, I think it'll be a massive breakthrough for public health. There are tons of diseases whose prevalence would be slashed just by raising the fitness level of the general population.

lukifer• 16 years ago

Heart health is brain health. Simple as that.

mrj2• 16 years ago

Well, as a brief mention said in the article, any exercise benefit to the brain used to be thought of mainly as an increased blood flow and oxygen uptake.

But more recent research is focused on the hippocampus and neurogenesis, actually growing new neurons by exercising. Unfortunately, there's no test that can actually prove the new cells are responsible for new learning.

This happens to be the focus of my current research paper. :-)

cynest• 16 years ago

Cool. So might the new neurons be more for motor control than say, mathematics?

How Exercise Boosts Your Brain

Related Stories