Ask HW: What is the state (for you) of CoffeeScript?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14037460

by usernamebias • 9 years ago

4 4 9 years ago

news.ycombinator.com

rraval• 9 years ago

For background, my startup has been using CoffeeScript since August 2012. A quick check of our git monorepo says that we have 130k lines of code at HEAD, and have probably thrown out at least as many lines in rewrites over the years.

I have a love/hate relationship with CoffeeScript. I detest the implicit function call and object literal syntax. At various points in the language's history, it seemed like the language was essentially "done" and in maintenance mode. Especially when the eco-system stagnates around it and large parts of the community move on to things like ES6 and TypeScript. For example, the JSX tool was essentially a prototype [1], with tons of bugs [2] that were never fixed. And in the 6 months since its deprecation, there isn't a single tool to replace it.

Personally speaking, I consider the language dead and was considering alternatives so we could move off it. However, I still haven't been able to justify it because the alternatives don't make the same tradeoffs that make me love CoffeeScript:

- Minimal to zero runtime requirements. CoffeeScript generates a few things like `__extends` but that's it!

- One to one correspondence with generated JS. Source maps are nice but it's great to step through the JS debugger when looking at JS, and being able to convert the JS you're looking at with the CoffeeScript that generated it is not something I want to give up.

- Recognizes the warts, fixes what it can, and then gets the hell out of the way. `==` in JS is a mistake and IMO no language should carry that forward. Lexical `this` binding shouldn't require hoops to jump through. That sort of thing.

Ideally, if we are paying the cost of switching away from CoffeeScript, we'd move to a language with static type checking and solid support for sum types. I haven't been able to find any such language though, and the recent development spurt in CoffeeScript seems to have staved off that need for now.

PS: Yes, I'm aware of TypeScript. It's sum type support is rather weak. As part of my initial testing to see if it was a suitable language, I found a 5 line program that crashed at runtime. The bug report was closed as "Working as intended" [3]

[1] https://github.com/jsdf/coffee-react-transform [2] https://github.com/jsdf/coffee-react-transform/issues/62 [3] https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/13884

jdd• 9 years ago

The TS response makes sense in light of the other issues your desired behavior would cause.

uwu• 9 years ago

for you

a project i know uses coffeescript and i see it as an additional hoop for possible contributors who otherwise know the web platform to jump through

(i contributed to that project once and accidentally introduced a bug related to variable scoping...)

i think nowadays people should be writing es6+ javascript instead (won't even need to transpile it in the future)

twobyfour• 9 years ago

Irrelevant. Never needed it, never wanted it. And I develop for web (full stack).

Ask HW: What is the state (for you) of CoffeeScript?

Related Stories