Performance comparison: Rails 1.2.6 vs 2.0.2

http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/18/performance-comparison-rails-126-vs-202/

by nickb • 18 years ago

19 3 18 years ago

izumi.plan99.net

azsromej• 18 years ago

I swear I was searching for a post on this topic just last night.

nickb is a powerful discovery engine.

Glimjaur• 18 years ago

http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/3/18/comparing-rails-2-0-...

"Hongli Lai has compared a dummy scaffold application from Rails 1.2 to Rails 2.0 and found the latter to be 30-50% faster. That’s great to see.

But what I think is even more interesting is the progress we’ve been making on performance optimizations for more substantial applications. Rails 2.0 made a lot of progress for applications with lots of assets and for ones with big routes.rb files. The forthcoming Rails 2.1 will move things forward even further."

technoguyrob• 18 years ago

Summary: Rails 2 is 30-50% faster. Rails 1.2 spends lots of time in session store, so turn it off for max speed (when not using Rails 2).

On a side note, what's up with the uhh...header image on the blog?

Performance comparison: Rails 1.2.6 vs 2.0.2

Related Stories