StartCom launches a new service – StartEncrypt

https://startssl.com/NewsDetails?date=20160606

by JoshTriplett • 10 years ago

23 10 10 years ago

startssl.com

voycey• 10 years ago

./install: 16: ./install: chkconfig: not found

install over, thanks !

Terrific - so Linux 64bit is actually only RedHat flavours - save your time if on a Debian distro

pmx• 10 years ago

Are they saying they're doing EV certs for free or is the page just badly worded?

thesimon• 10 years ago

They are free, you just seem to need a paid account (as before)

hlandau• 10 years ago

Okay, there's a lot that's dubious about this.

Firstly, they've completely ignored the existing standards effort of ACME, which Let's Encrypt has cooperated with to develop, and created their own API. This detracts from the effort to standardise this, to no real end. Use Let's Encrypt and you can avail yourself of the entire ecosystem of ACME clients, of which there are many (I develop one). It's likely there will be other CAs supporting ACME in time as well. Whereas this is a CA-specific API with, presently, one implementation.

Secondly, they're still carrying out the dubious practice of charging for revocations.

Thirdly, they claim "Not just for one domain, but up to 120 domains with wildcard support", but this is under their 'Pro' offering, yet Let's Encrypt supports up to 100 SANs per certificate for free. Their free service is limited to 5 SANs.

The only apparent benefit of their free certificates over LE certificates is the one year expiry time. But the whole point of the LE 90 day expiry time is to motivate automation, which is a gain in the long term.

Fourthly, their website is full of broken English, which is impressively amateurish for a CA and the high barriers to entry you generally expect that to imply.

vtlynch• 10 years ago

They were recently acquired by a Chinese company. Most stuff they have put out since their acquisition seems to imply that whoever is writing their text is not a native English speaker.

regecks• 10 years ago

Bit late, but an R&D contact from StartCom told me that they will be supporting IETF ACME with StartEncrypt, with the possibility of open source as well.

nailer• 10 years ago

It also apparently supports Flock, a browser that hasn't existed for 5 years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_(web_browser)

epicaricacy• 10 years ago

Finally. Us Flock users are tired of being the second class citizens of the internet! /s

nblr• 10 years ago

Binary client. Uhm. Yeah... nope. Wasn't StartSSL (haha. SSL) the CA that also offered to create the key on your behalf? Sketchy!

Jaruzel• 10 years ago

As a StartSSL customer, I've just had the email in my inbox telling me all about this.

I know people don't like them, but before LetsEncrypt, StartSSL were one of the few providers of basic certs that were free. All I needed for my home setup was a cert for my Exchange server, and they've been providing me one for about 5 years now, and I've never had a problem, and every client trusted it[1]. Granted, their website is a bit weird, but once you work it out, it's fairly easy to renew a free cert.

Obviously, next renewal I'll be jumping ship to LetsEncrypt (now that the ACME clients for Windows have matured), so I am left struggling to see what benefit StartEcrypt has over LetsEncrypt.

[1] Coincidently, BB10 on Blackberrys does not trust the CA chain for LetsEncrypt certs, and it's unlikely Blackberry will ever fix this.

StartCom launches a new service – StartEncrypt

Related Stories