Ask YC: Anyone using Lua for web apps?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=118355

by danw • 18 years ago

11 11 18 years ago

news.ycombinator.com

Lua looks like a nice language and I'm playing with it now. Has anyone tried building a web app in it, and if so what are your experiences?

hhm• 18 years ago

Not web related but: I have used it for game development in many proyects and it was fantastic.

sgoraya• 18 years ago

ditto

Great scripting language for game deveopmet - Not sure that I would use it for web development however;

pkaler• 18 years ago

Ditto. Used it on PC, PSP, and PS3.

rnc000• 18 years ago

Take a look at

http://google.decenturl.com/allinurl-cgilua-google-search

I know a couple of success cases in Brazil: http://www.vale.com (among the 5 biggest Metal & Mining companies in the world) and http://www.petrobras.com/ (among the 10 biggest oil & gas companies in the world) use Lua for some parts of their web site.

LogicHoleFlaw• 18 years ago

I have not used Lua for web apps, but I do know that the Kepler project is quite active these days. They're developing a whole suite of tools for a Lua web stack. www.keplerproject.org

Personally I love Lua as a language. It has just the right blend of functional, imperative, and OO concepts to let me dabble in different styles as I see fit. It's an elegant language which also has a great community.

Lua is what I turn to when I want to prototype an idea or just scratch out a rough draft of some calculations. I have yet to write any in-the-large software in it, but I suspect that it would scale nicely as well.

Anyway, have fun with Lua. I know I am!

fab13n• 18 years ago

This is not specifically web-app oriented, but:

<plug>Lua lovers on YNews might be interested by metalua [http://metalua.luaforge.net].</plug>

bouncingsoul• 18 years ago

I've looked at Lua in the past. I chose not to spend time learning it because it doesn't seem to offer anything. It's basically Python with a smaller footprint and fewer libraries, as far I can tell.

The small footprint seems to be the most touted feature. I'm sure it's useful if you need it, but if not, I don't see the point.

dhouston• 18 years ago

i had the same reaction (lua resembling python but with a focus on small footprint and a much smaller standard library.)

having "batteries included"/mature web frameworks often trumps the innate benefits of the language, i.e. other people who have spent thousands of hours on mostly boring glue -- ORMs, unicode support, templating engines, caching, getting around browser quirks -- to enable you to focus on your app.

furthermore, you're generally going to be bounded by IO/the database or RAM or some other factor in which case the speed of the language is mostly irrelevant.

it's certainly possible to do web development in any language, but why bother swimming upstream when python/php/ruby do a lot of the hard work for you? it's hard enough just to write your application without having to write the infrastructure beneath it too.

richcollins• 18 years ago

There are probably performance improvements over python:

http://luajit.org/luajit_performance.html

rtf• 18 years ago

The other way to look at it is that Lua has a simple enough binding interface that it's like a "high-level layer on top of C." So you can write C, or write Lua, and slop things around between them as necessary, run multiple interpreters, whatever you feel like.

Python is more focused on extending the language as a singular entity, and (not having actually written extensions) it seems to have more strenuous requirements.

Right now I'm focused on haXe, though, cause with that language, you get several platform options, including a Lua-like interpreter(Neko).

tehmoth• 18 years ago

in what way does it resemble python? if anything it resembles pascal with a (small) dash of perl.

Ask YC: Anyone using Lua for web apps?

Related Stories