AT&T admits NYC/San Fran 3G service sucked

http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/01/28/holy-wow-att-admits-nycsan-fran-3g-service-sucked/

by hshah • 16 years ago

13 6 16 years ago

spamizbad• 16 years ago

LA and Chicago are also pretty bad. If you're curious as to what it's like being an ATT customer in a major city, it's like I'm being punished for not living in Real America. Service is much better in mid-sized cities as I understand.

thewiglaf• 16 years ago

This little article kinda stinks. I don't have personal experience with their networks in SF or NYC, but without a y-axis on those graphs or a definition of "Voice Composite Quality Index", I don't think you can really draw any conclusions other than they are improving over time. Seems like this guy is just looking for a reason as to why his service is shoddy.

Retric• 16 years ago

3G coverage also sucks in Arlington va, which is just outside of DC.

mattdennewitz• 16 years ago

hey, dont forget chicago!

nick-dap• 16 years ago

First step is admitting that you have a problem.

After a year of crappy service I finally found a way to improve reception on my iPhone... I gave it up and switched to Verizon.

smokey_the_bear• 16 years ago

Most months I use 0 voice minutes on my iPhone. The phone quality is just so bad that I'll borrow someone else's phone or use a softphone on my computer if at all possible. It barely occurs to me to use it as a phone.

I've lived in SF with it, and driven 25,000 miles around the entire US with the 3G and 3GS. It sucks everywhere.

AT&T admits NYC/San Fran 3G service sucked

Related Stories