Replacing GNU assembler with Factor code

http://factor-language.blogspot.com/2010/01/replacing-gnu-assembler-with-factor.html

by fogus • 17 years ago

38 5 17 years ago

factor-language.blogspot.com

csmeder• 17 years ago

What are the advantages/differences of using Factor compared to Forth?

xtho2• 17 years ago

I'd say factor is to forth what clojure is to scheme: a modernized version (with a larger footprint).

dkersten• 16 years ago

Factor has very little in common with Forth, besides having a stack based concatenative syntax based off Forths. It has often been said within the Factor community that Factor has much much more in common with Lisp than it does with Forth.

LucaDuval• 16 years ago

From the FACTOR's FAQ: "Forth is untyped, not garbage collected, and close to the machine. For flow control, Forth code tends to use immediate words. Variables and arrays tend to be global, and programs aren't usually written in a functional manner. Factor is very different from this. It is dynamically typed, offering a high degree of reflection. Unreferenced objects are garbage collected with a generational garbage collector. Factor code is a little bit more distant from the machine, though the C FFI allows using words like malloc and mmap. For flow control, Factor generally uses quotations, allowing flexible higher order functions; parsing words are used mostly for definitions and data literals. Variables are dynamically or statically scoped, and arrays are just objects which don't need to be treated specially"

Replacing GNU assembler with Factor code

Related Stories