There Is No Theory of Everything

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/09/12/there-is-no-theory-of-everything/

by cpete • 11 years ago

8 10 11 years ago

opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com

vixen99• 11 years ago

"As we know to our cost, we witness this every day with climate change deniers".

Denial? No one will deny there's an asteroid bearing down on us, if there is. No one will deny that an appalling virus released from a research lab can kill us all, if in fact it was released and can do that. Denial is reserved for deviation from a faith. Such deviants are called heretics. The religious terminology says it all. Why talk about denial if the evidence is screaming at us. Please point to it; that's all you have to do. The heretics will recant immediately. Is CAGW a 'faith'? I guess so.

nerd_stuff3• 11 years ago

A quick Google search gives these top links for starters:

NASA: Climate Change Evidence - http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/indicators/

Union of Concerned Scientists: http://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/science-and-im...

Weather Underground: Evidence of Climate Change: http://www.wunderground.com/climate/evidence.asp

cholantesh3• 11 years ago

I have a strong suspicion that few 'heretics' will be 'recanting' today.

EliRivers3• 11 years ago

None of that evidence counts. It's all falsified. Or the people producing it are stooges. Or they're so stupid they get it wrong. Some of it is a conspiracy. Some of it is misinterpreted. And it's a good thing anyway. And even if it's real (which it isn't) it's not caused by anything humans do.

I can come up with a million of these. When an axiomatic starting point is fixed (hello religion and other cultural beliefs), you can come up with post-hoc rationalisations that not only mean you get to be right, but you get to feel smart and special (and with this one, you get to make people who have no idea what they're talking about feel that their street-smarts or some bullshit "common sense" is superior to actually knowing things, like those scientists who think they're so much better than everyone else). Trying to reason anyone out of a position they did not reach through reason is a wasted effort. You'll just go insane if you try :)

EliRivers3• 11 years ago

No one will deny there's an asteroid bearing down on us, if there is.

Hello, humanity? Of course they would.

nerd_stuff3• 11 years ago

One huge problem with scientism is that it invites, as an almost allergic reaction, the total rejection of science. As we know to our cost, we witness this every day with climate change deniers...

Just a few paragraphs later he celebrates how irritating philosophy is while sidestepping how much its pompous pedanticism encourages anti-intellectualism. If it's a "huge problem with scientism" then it should also be a huge problem with philosophism.

It's also unclear how exactly "scientism" is responsible for climate change deniers. Somebody says "I believe someday science will explain everything!" and so somebody else says "Oh yeah? Climate change is a hoax by the government to get money!" Perhaps the author uses the word to describe being arrogant about science but you can be plenty arrogant about it without adopting a view of "scientism".

There Is No Theory of Everything

Related Stories